Skip to content
SYNAPPTIQ©
Editorial artwork: a detailed human brain, introducing connected pharmaceutical evidence

The platform

Connect the evidence for your next access discussion.

Prepare for a payer meeting, investigate an evidence gap or examine launch assumptions with capabilities that share the same medicine context.

Synapptiq connects published regulatory, HTA, clinical, economic and NHS evidence. Each capability answers a different question, and analysis or scenario estimates are never presented as established findings.

The architecture: connected around the medicine

An agreed medicine reference links names, presentations and codes across the evidence each capability uses.

  • Regulatory history provides the licensing context for the medicine and indication.
  • HTA precedent keeps agency recommendations, assessed populations, comparators, conditions and uncertainties together.
  • Clinical and safety evidence connects published findings to their studied populations and endpoints.
  • Economic evidence keeps the assessed economic case and model methods.
  • Published NHS activity adds reporting periods, geography and source-specific use and cost measures.
  • Recorded precedent and stated assumptions support scenario estimates without changing the status of the published evidence.
  • Evidence checks support review of source, scope and discrepancies.
  • Shared medicine references keep the medicine context connected across capabilities.

Nine capabilities

Choose the question you need to investigate.

Editorial artwork introducing Medicine Workspace
Editorial artwork, not an application screen

What should we examine before the next payer discussion?

Prepare an access discussion by reviewing the medicine's connected evidence and unresolved questions.

Evidence used
Regulatory history, HTA position, clinical and safety evidence, and economics
What you receive
A connected review of one medicine
Explore Medicine Workspace

From evidence review to executive discussion

Start in Medicine Workspace to review a medicine's regulatory history, HTA position, clinical and safety evidence, and economics.

Use HTA Library to compare how agencies assessed the population, comparator, clinical benefit and economic case. Use Evidence Finder to locate supporting evidence by medicine, trial name, registration identifier or appraisal reference.

Executive Briefs brings the selected findings into a structured, source-linked report for colleagues in the decision room. Reports are available in PDF, Word and HTML, with optional customer branding.

Where, how much and when

NHS Analytics supports account planning, access discussions and generic-entry assessment with published community prescribing and hospital medicines activity and cost, from national to local organisations.

NHS Intelligence adds the time dimension: examine published NHS activity with positive decisions from the relevant UK HTA body marked on the timeline. Choose the nation, source, organisation level, presentation, measure and period, then export the view. Markers are historical context, not evidence that an HTA decision caused a change.

Community and hospital measures remain separate. Indicative hospital cost excludes confidential discounts and rebates and is not actual net expenditure. Drug Tariff values are reimbursement reference prices. Nation-specific measures are not interchangeable.

Test assumptions without changing the evidence

Regulatory Predictor estimates EMA or MHRA timing windows from product characteristics and recorded regulatory precedent. It does not estimate whether approval will be granted.

Reimbursement Predictor estimates submission, authorisation, HTA and first-NHS-use milestones from a reference medicine and scenario assumptions. Licensing, agency recommendation, commissioning and recorded NHS use remain distinct; it does not estimate the HTA verdict.

Launch Simulator compares conservative, central and optimistic uptake and budget scenarios using reimbursement timing and recorded uptake patterns. Evidence-supported years remain distinct from projected assumptions, and NHS cost is not supplier income.

These are scenario estimates, not established findings or forecasts.

Keep the basis of the discussion visible

Sources, populations, periods and material limitations support scrutiny of every finding, and scenario assumptions remain explicit.

Read how evidence checks, evidence states and human review work on the Governance page.

Request a demonstration

Sources behind these findings

  • Snapshot 27 Oct 2026

    Evidence catalogue: 221,951 records; 2,605 trials; 17,353 appraisal links; 23,459 product links

    Source: Synapptiq Evidence Finder catalogue · Reviewed 2026-10-27 · Review due 2027-10-27

  • 3,510 records, 7 agencies

    Over 3,500 appraisal records across seven HTA bodies

    Source: Synapptiq HTA appraisal records · Reviewed 2026-10-27 · Review due 2027-10-27

  • NHS Analytics

    England and Scotland kept separate with nation-specific measures

    Source: Synapptiq application · Reviewed 2026-10-27 · Review due 2027-10-27

  • NHS Analytics GP/hospital views

    Months not shown are listed by name; missing never drawn as zero

    Source: Synapptiq application · Reviewed 2026-10-27 · Review due 2027-10-27

  • aggregate published files

    No patient-level NHS data held

    Source: NHSBSA English Prescribing Dataset (EPD); NHSBSA Secondary Care Medicines Data (SCMD); Public Health Scotland prescribing data · Reviewed 2026-10-27 · Review due 2027-10-27